Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 01:59:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33ED8D29FEB5589E241DFDD1EF8C3947E3D3CD61E3107E57C950D74D4108B434
Participant Details

Original Note:

Per the source link; "The group doled out the funds based on who would be the best spokespeople for its pro-Trump agenda, despite the billionaire's assertion that winners would be chosen randomly." https://www.xm.com/au/research/markets/allNews/reuters/pennsylvania-judge-allows-elon-musks-1-million-voter-giveaway-53960233

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853591970356355452
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33ED8D29FEB5589E241DFDD1EF8C3947E3D3CD61E3107E57C950D74D4108B434
  • createdAtMillis - 1730771974016
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185359197035635545233ED8D29FEB5589E241DFDD1EF8C3947E3D3CD61E3107E57C950D74D4108B434