Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 01:36:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64CAE0DAB4F57B164181733993D52D388EBCC4056BF4183570BCA50B586E0307
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There’s no proof of it being an undisclosed ad. That’s speculation and not enough grounds to hold up in any reputable court. Comment or report if you believe it is.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853564668578758951
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64CAE0DAB4F57B164181733993D52D388EBCC4056BF4183570BCA50B586E0307
  • createdAtMillis - 1730770573739
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185356466857875895164CAE0DAB4F57B164181733993D52D388EBCC4056BF4183570BCA50B586E0307