Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 02:26:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 504707ACA56616B3784653FC0916E0661FCE20141B3998B2505BC3D90869ACB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There’s no proof of it being an undisclosed ad. That’s speculation and not enough grounds to hold up in any reputable court. Comment or report if you believe it is.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853564668578758951
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 504707ACA56616B3784653FC0916E0661FCE20141B3998B2505BC3D90869ACB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1730773605363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853564668578758951504707ACA56616B3784653FC0916E0661FCE20141B3998B2505BC3D90869ACB4