Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 01:26:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33039C89DC28B606974515B917D3482406C208BD53A129E7421BC7C07B69945D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There’s no proof of it being an undisclosed ad. That’s speculation and not enough grounds to hold up in any reputable court. Comment or report if you believe it is.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853564668578758951
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33039C89DC28B606974515B917D3482406C208BD53A129E7421BC7C07B69945D
  • createdAtMillis - 1730769988056
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185356466857875895133039C89DC28B606974515B917D3482406C208BD53A129E7421BC7C07B69945D