Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 20:47:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C580995708E10C6037BE248909A47418CC30465E5AF972654C953F3B1D9D9200
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other CN are argumentative and using outdated information in their sources. Using outdated data simply to adhere to one's bias is an argumentative position that abuses the purposes of CN. The latest data confirms the post https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853517122409754860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C580995708E10C6037BE248909A47418CC30465E5AF972654C953F3B1D9D9200
  • createdAtMillis - 1730753254578
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853517122409754860C580995708E10C6037BE248909A47418CC30465E5AF972654C953F3B1D9D9200