Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 20:36:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A329F86945645AC46834B942C79AEF86E750385F6852D73136D6B8E725292251
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other CN are argumentative and using outdated information in their sources. Using outdated data simply to adhere to one's bias is an argumentative position that abuses the purposes of CN. The latest data confirms the post https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853517122409754860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A329F86945645AC46834B942C79AEF86E750385F6852D73136D6B8E725292251
  • createdAtMillis - 1731184563472
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853517122409754860A329F86945645AC46834B942C79AEF86E750385F6852D73136D6B8E725292251