Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 04:11:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E71A9C228A0966BF835643CE9B49D757CDE9AFADD893C35192E46510DF93F79
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other CN are argumentative and using outdated information in their sources. Using outdated data simply to adhere to one's bias is an argumentative position that abuses the purposes of CN. The latest data confirms the post https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853517122409754860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E71A9C228A0966BF835643CE9B49D757CDE9AFADD893C35192E46510DF93F79
  • createdAtMillis - 1730779911691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18535171224097548609E71A9C228A0966BF835643CE9B49D757CDE9AFADD893C35192E46510DF93F79