Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 21:02:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 361AD879CEF7FFED669C42C086786B5AEE141AE9FB27092DF44F4DB668D69A2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Other CN are argumentative and using outdated information in their sources. Using outdated data simply to adhere to one's bias is an argumentative position that abuses the purposes of CN. The latest data confirms the post https://lecorrespondant.net/imane-khelif-ni-ovaires-ni-uterus-mais-des-testicules/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853517122409754860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 361AD879CEF7FFED669C42C086786B5AEE141AE9FB27092DF44F4DB668D69A2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1730754176601
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853517122409754860361AD879CEF7FFED669C42C086786B5AEE141AE9FB27092DF44F4DB668D69A2A