Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 17:58:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 226EA59FEA202EC94B7C66DC7D0F0145A698EE25BEE7158ABA9B3B5B8E77DD13
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Letters to the editor are regularly published in journals such as this and there’s no clear boundary between letters and papers; the author doesn’t refer to a “research paper”. There’s no obligation to refer to an additional paper, this stands on its own.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853493117091250450
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 226EA59FEA202EC94B7C66DC7D0F0145A698EE25BEE7158ABA9B3B5B8E77DD13
  • createdAtMillis - 1730743134354
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853493117091250450226EA59FEA202EC94B7C66DC7D0F0145A698EE25BEE7158ABA9B3B5B8E77DD13