Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 16:59:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0B220087A165E9FC0385D6382F4718AC82C6E64894DB3104B1151C9B4E05911
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It is a considered many-author response to an invited editorial in an academic journal. It meets the definition of paper. Thoughts about this and any other references thought helpful belong in the comments not CNs. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/paper

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853481479856103803
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0B220087A165E9FC0385D6382F4718AC82C6E64894DB3104B1151C9B4E05911
  • createdAtMillis - 1730739550516
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853481479856103803A0B220087A165E9FC0385D6382F4718AC82C6E64894DB3104B1151C9B4E05911