Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 17:32:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93275629574AC5E3604BB42E8CBDF492F85ACE2732F2167D5E5A5F07D48BEF1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It is a considered many-author response to an invited editorial in an academic journal. It meets the definition of paper. Thoughts about this and any other references thought helpful belong in the comments not CNs. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/paper

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853481479856103803
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93275629574AC5E3604BB42E8CBDF492F85ACE2732F2167D5E5A5F07D48BEF1F
  • createdAtMillis - 1730741568751
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185348147985610380393275629574AC5E3604BB42E8CBDF492F85ACE2732F2167D5E5A5F07D48BEF1F