Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 13:25:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5835DA0AE6C9EECBFAA49F2BB52E33685B1FD470ECFE65F7C1A76EBA053F8170
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It is a considered many-author response to an invited editorial in an academic journal. It meets the definition of paper. Thoughts about this and any other references thought helpful belong in the comments not CNs. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/paper

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853481479856103803
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5835DA0AE6C9EECBFAA49F2BB52E33685B1FD470ECFE65F7C1A76EBA053F8170
  • createdAtMillis - 1730813153358
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18534814798561038035835DA0AE6C9EECBFAA49F2BB52E33685B1FD470ECFE65F7C1A76EBA053F8170