Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 23:48:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D486377DD39470AF3709E75D3BC1633D83C264C5E80400C4B086DD7D32C55BA9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This must be read together with an expert response by Tucker et al, addressing the points made. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/sms.14754

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853466207942308137
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D486377DD39470AF3709E75D3BC1633D83C264C5E80400C4B086DD7D32C55BA9
  • createdAtMillis - 1730764125958
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1853466207942308137D486377DD39470AF3709E75D3BC1633D83C264C5E80400C4B086DD7D32C55BA9