Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 16:27:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2FA8A617159402CA471D75EE41B9D1064A391E140B80BC6AF9499EFA88F0B4C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This must be read together with an expert response by Tucker et al, addressing the points made. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/sms.14754

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853466207942308137
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2FA8A617159402CA471D75EE41B9D1064A391E140B80BC6AF9499EFA88F0B4C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1730737621902
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18534662079423081372FA8A617159402CA471D75EE41B9D1064A391E140B80BC6AF9499EFA88F0B4C1