Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 17:29:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2070C3621EFED9C193A5ADF42EB94F8CCAF3176AB12A51C0FBE85F70C8E3E3EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This must be read together with an expert response by Tucker et al, addressing the points made. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/sms.14754

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853466207942308137
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2070C3621EFED9C193A5ADF42EB94F8CCAF3176AB12A51C0FBE85F70C8E3E3EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1730827782324
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18534662079423081372070C3621EFED9C193A5ADF42EB94F8CCAF3176AB12A51C0FBE85F70C8E3E3EA