Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 21:12:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54D97D2BF36C307101E58E3658F400C1138D21F26D4BA250CA504B6A0AA3F6F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is a letter to the editor, not a paper as claimed by Rutherford. LETTER TO THE EDITOR https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sms.14753

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853459291228844302
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 54D97D2BF36C307101E58E3658F400C1138D21F26D4BA250CA504B6A0AA3F6F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1730754752542
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185345929122884430254D97D2BF36C307101E58E3658F400C1138D21F26D4BA250CA504B6A0AA3F6F8