Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 21:32:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26C8CB80963C4D4C44FAD89A92FC28519FA39B7A49F4BC03A125E01191203206
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is a letter to the editor, not a paper as claimed by Rutherford. LETTER TO THE EDITOR https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sms.14753

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853459291228844302
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26C8CB80963C4D4C44FAD89A92FC28519FA39B7A49F4BC03A125E01191203206
  • createdAtMillis - 1730755924784
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185345929122884430226C8CB80963C4D4C44FAD89A92FC28519FA39B7A49F4BC03A125E01191203206