Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 20:17:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D357CB58230339E41EB58A6A475D898512D6BA6B001B404CE14F912660D5B2BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Les "sources" sont introuvables, y compris sur les pages pubmed des auteurs déclarés. Il est plausible que le Twitt ai été generé par ChatGPT avec un prompte demandant des études sur l'efficacité de l'ostéopathie, ce qui indique que l'auteur ne maîtrise pas le sujet. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Hayden+C&cauthor_id=16648084 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Cerritelli+F&cauthor_id=28352200

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1853445515113066616
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D357CB58230339E41EB58A6A475D898512D6BA6B001B404CE14F912660D5B2BA
createdAtMillis - 1730751451937
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1853445515113066616D357CB58230339E41EB58A6A475D898512D6BA6B001B404CE14F912660D5B2BA