Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 13:02:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5C818A51CD6125C92527793FCDE6EE62B5CCFDB2EB823F7B90B36A9A8FE296D
Participant Details

Original Note:

イベルメクチンは、興和、北里のイベルメクチンの2つのランダム化比較試験(RCT)で新型コロナへの有効性は見だされず https://www.kowa.co.jp/news/2022/press20220926.html https://www.kitasato-u.ac.jp/khp/topics/2022/20220930.html 世界的にもRCTのメタ解析でも臨床アウトカムの改善への有効性は見だされていません。 https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/74/6/1022/6310839?login=false https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001663?casa_token=BShl-qSiS2EAAAAA:lUaSQL960ThyZdOKwn5PXDJTZs6a3fQy_rFZ-vBBLIBKnjXOjZ-4Tve4AD5lkpkz5BslvBge0z8 効果が0なのかはともかく、とてもこうした話をするようなエビデンスの状況ではありませんので、動画は誤解を招く投稿です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853390170797809788
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5C818A51CD6125C92527793FCDE6EE62B5CCFDB2EB823F7B90B36A9A8FE296D
  • createdAtMillis - 1730725333785
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1853390170797809788F5C818A51CD6125C92527793FCDE6EE62B5CCFDB2EB823F7B90B36A9A8FE296D