Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 11:36:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E84D67133E415FFA0B9FB1016E5394B0B56D29936806F13EBE3FF2A0FA13B1AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

イベルメクチンは、興和、北里のイベルメクチンの2つのランダム化比較試験(RCT)で新型コロナへの有効性は見だされず https://www.kowa.co.jp/news/2022/press20220926.html https://www.kitasato-u.ac.jp/khp/topics/2022/20220930.html 世界的にもRCTのメタ解析でも臨床アウトカムの改善への有効性は見だされていません。 https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/74/6/1022/6310839?login=false https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001663?casa_token=BShl-qSiS2EAAAAA:lUaSQL960ThyZdOKwn5PXDJTZs6a3fQy_rFZ-vBBLIBKnjXOjZ-4Tve4AD5lkpkz5BslvBge0z8 効果が0なのかはともかく、とてもこうした話をするようなエビデンスの状況ではありませんので、動画は誤解を招く投稿です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853390170797809788
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E84D67133E415FFA0B9FB1016E5394B0B56D29936806F13EBE3FF2A0FA13B1AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1730720166593
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853390170797809788E84D67133E415FFA0B9FB1016E5394B0B56D29936806F13EBE3FF2A0FA13B1AB