Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 09:04:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 220581D597A3CF83E44A476AC7B8A5F23AB0183F5BDA631E1207FA91AB50BB08
Participant Details

Original Note:

給付型の理由として、元ポストのツリー内で「即応性を重視した施策である」や「過渡的措置で……本質的解決を目指すことが前提」と言及されています。 https://x.com/mroksk/status/1852901252495179933 背景情報が欠けて間違った推測がされているため補足を追加します。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853358878161047874
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 220581D597A3CF83E44A476AC7B8A5F23AB0183F5BDA631E1207FA91AB50BB08
  • createdAtMillis - 1730711051713
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853358878161047874220581D597A3CF83E44A476AC7B8A5F23AB0183F5BDA631E1207FA91AB50BB08