Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 03:02:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2882525F9C3D391184E1FA29394F21E428782BD3BFD03C63FBBDE5D03FE4EB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the clearly stated opinion of a well known pollster, and pollsters all rely on their own judgement to weight polls. NNN. Further, report all proposed CNs for being bots. They're clearly coordinated with their talking points and links. Dismantle the botnet!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853251759336214835
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2882525F9C3D391184E1FA29394F21E428782BD3BFD03C63FBBDE5D03FE4EB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1730689354972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853251759336214835F2882525F9C3D391184E1FA29394F21E428782BD3BFD03C63FBBDE5D03FE4EB3