Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 13:43:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3B51E1BCC922DF4E4CEB98F43612B41AFD07542D32B678F537EDDA6A7821F92
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the clearly stated opinion of a well known pollster, and pollsters all rely on their own judgement to weight polls. NNN. Further, report all proposed CNs for being bots. They're clearly coordinated with their talking points and links. Dismantle the botnet!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853251759336214835
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3B51E1BCC922DF4E4CEB98F43612B41AFD07542D32B678F537EDDA6A7821F92
  • createdAtMillis - 1730727837412
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853251759336214835C3B51E1BCC922DF4E4CEB98F43612B41AFD07542D32B678F537EDDA6A7821F92