Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 11:46:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the clearly stated opinion of a well known pollster, and pollsters all rely on their own judgement to weight polls. NNN. Further, report all proposed CNs for being bots. They're clearly coordinated with their talking points and links. Dismantle the botnet!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853251759336214835
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1730720794474
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853251759336214835B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD