Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 02:42:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 800149E92675C371F8F99E20A239C75EE858AB538A63F9E54845EC6E475ED90C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the clearly stated opinion of a well known pollster, and pollsters all rely on their own judgement to weight polls. NNN. Further, report all proposed CNs for being bots. They're clearly coordinated with their talking points and links. Dismantle the botnet!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853251759336214835
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 800149E92675C371F8F99E20A239C75EE858AB538A63F9E54845EC6E475ED90C
  • createdAtMillis - 1730774542703
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853251759336214835800149E92675C371F8F99E20A239C75EE858AB538A63F9E54845EC6E475ED90C