Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 17:49:40 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 280D4D866E12B951F9F3E9FD54C5F91CB75B75FDDFD83BCE80F6EB7DD1A4E469
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is the clearly stated opinion of a well known pollster, and pollsters all rely on their own judgement to weight polls. NNN. Further, report all proposed CNs for being bots. They're clearly coordinated with their talking points and links. Dismantle the botnet!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853251759336214835
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 280D4D866E12B951F9F3E9FD54C5F91CB75B75FDDFD83BCE80F6EB7DD1A4E469
  • createdAtMillis - 1730742580782
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853251759336214835280D4D866E12B951F9F3E9FD54C5F91CB75B75FDDFD83BCE80F6EB7DD1A4E469