Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 01:33:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E20DEA1D3961FBF6BBDF73E9DD4B4E9B5CB29D3245E5335093055C2CAAAF6DE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The page this tweet links to seems says something the opposite: Mitchell's quote is that, while he now thinks he is under sampling these populations, he chose to *not* revamp sample metrics & kept the same weights. https://mirs-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/5931-MI%20STATEWIDE%20MITCHELL%20POLL%20-FIELD%20COPY%20-%20%20EXEC%20SUMMARY%20-%20CROSSTABS%20%20OF%20MI%20106PM%20%2011-3-24.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853245848768934134
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E20DEA1D3961FBF6BBDF73E9DD4B4E9B5CB29D3245E5335093055C2CAAAF6DE1
  • createdAtMillis - 1730684037547
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853245848768934134E20DEA1D3961FBF6BBDF73E9DD4B4E9B5CB29D3245E5335093055C2CAAAF6DE1