Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-27 15:58:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

この記事の元となった論文はこちらです https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724001298 Table2にまとめられているように、私有の住宅地での緑の減少が大きいことが確認されています

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853192858469380529
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1732723131417
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185319285846938052915E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1