Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 23:20:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 079E54C5CF6F31B4E4331B5289A3D870FE327A729E29C4EC1EF7C813D6F6ACB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

この記事の元となった論文はこちらです https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724001298 Table2にまとめられているように、私有の住宅地での緑の減少が大きいことが確認されています

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853192858469380529
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 079E54C5CF6F31B4E4331B5289A3D870FE327A729E29C4EC1EF7C813D6F6ACB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1730676059811
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853192858469380529079E54C5CF6F31B4E4331B5289A3D870FE327A729E29C4EC1EF7C813D6F6ACB9