Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 19:03:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 032E4C10F456BDECAA19321680B64A4151E316ADBF2BDC96AB4CD074B8982195
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re NTP article quoted in another CN: The note omits key details from the article such as water fluoridation levels in US and that evaluated data was based primarily on epidemiology studies in non-U.S. countries such as Canada, China, India, Iran, Pakistan, and Mexico. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/completed/fluoride

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853116303038439588
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 032E4C10F456BDECAA19321680B64A4151E316ADBF2BDC96AB4CD074B8982195
  • createdAtMillis - 1730660587530
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853116303038439588032E4C10F456BDECAA19321680B64A4151E316ADBF2BDC96AB4CD074B8982195