Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 22:54:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0CACD4AB05837940991F53254D6C6B73D1F2A45CC32A5F60724DE9C89F2136E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Regardless of the truthfulness of the study by a conservative think tank, media coverage of the candidates does not qualify as election interference. Methods of election interference would be vote rigging, buying votes or advertising near polling stations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_interference https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2024/october/what-to-know-about-election-manipulation-and-new-legal-safeguard.html https://time.com/7096453/election-2024-security/ https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/FBI-Election-Interference-Report-FINAL--10-30-24-.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852990413688189418
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0CACD4AB05837940991F53254D6C6B73D1F2A45CC32A5F60724DE9C89F2136E
  • createdAtMillis - 1730674470143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852990413688189418C0CACD4AB05837940991F53254D6C6B73D1F2A45CC32A5F60724DE9C89F2136E