Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 04:43:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5623C65802813A8EC55097DDA055591E216C4FF4B99E4564313A6356257A68A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the above note saying a worker was bitten is not supported by it's own citation. That citation says a person involved in the INVESTIGATION was bitten. If they hadn't seized the squirrel, no bite. "a person involved with the investigation was bitten by the squirrel" https://apnews.com/article/new-york-pet-squirrel-seized-peanut-pnut-e6318ee7e74492465bb6b0fc22f085ad

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1852934197784003008
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5623C65802813A8EC55097DDA055591E216C4FF4B99E4564313A6356257A68A6
createdAtMillis - 1730608986781
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18529341977840030085623C65802813A8EC55097DDA055591E216C4FF4B99E4564313A6356257A68A6