Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 06:53:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53CDE507F44C90859AE3A57070C6A7DA2007A5AE63FFC73B6D51573CD0D27695
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the above note saying a worker was bitten is not supported by it's own citation. That citation says a person involved in the INVESTIGATION was bitten. If they hadn't seized the squirrel, no bite. "a person involved with the investigation was bitten by the squirrel" https://apnews.com/article/new-york-pet-squirrel-seized-peanut-pnut-e6318ee7e74492465bb6b0fc22f085ad

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852934197784003008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53CDE507F44C90859AE3A57070C6A7DA2007A5AE63FFC73B6D51573CD0D27695
  • createdAtMillis - 1730616803827
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185293419778400300853CDE507F44C90859AE3A57070C6A7DA2007A5AE63FFC73B6D51573CD0D27695