Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 06:12:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37C47F66AD4B54B985E8E81A4C6A2647AAB18D83E99E5D016C97DA39555E4289
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the above note saying a worker was bitten is not supported by it's own citation. That citation says a person involved in the INVESTIGATION was bitten. If they hadn't seized the squirrel, no bite. "a person involved with the investigation was bitten by the squirrel" https://apnews.com/article/new-york-pet-squirrel-seized-peanut-pnut-e6318ee7e74492465bb6b0fc22f085ad

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852934197784003008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37C47F66AD4B54B985E8E81A4C6A2647AAB18D83E99E5D016C97DA39555E4289
  • createdAtMillis - 1730614358235
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185293419778400300837C47F66AD4B54B985E8E81A4C6A2647AAB18D83E99E5D016C97DA39555E4289