Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 08:50:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F13E7451D91B71E806235185F86D6D0B2C2967F17186FE5B69748C183264C357
Participant Details

Original Note:

La afirmación sobre la sentencia es falsa en lo tocante al estado de alarma. Se declaró que el uso del estado de alarma para suspender los derechos fundamentales era inconstitucional siendo el correcto el de excepción. Para la actual situación si aplica el estado de alarma. https://www.iberley.es/revista/analisis-stc-sobre-inconstitucionalidad-estado-alarma-covid-19-604 https://app.congreso.es/consti/constitucion/indice/sinopsis/sinopsis.jsp?art=116&tipo=2&origin=serp_auto

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852932715080757517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F13E7451D91B71E806235185F86D6D0B2C2967F17186FE5B69748C183264C357
  • createdAtMillis - 1730623837435
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852932715080757517F13E7451D91B71E806235185F86D6D0B2C2967F17186FE5B69748C183264C357