Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 07:30:05 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6E8508394CDC03C9B20F38A966175D8FB6647EF07642D3956E80401EC7D2E85
Participant Details

Original Note:

La afirmación sobre la sentencia es falsa en lo tocante al estado de alarma. Se declaró que el uso del estado de alarma para suspender los derechos fundamentales era inconstitucional siendo el correcto el de excepción. Para la actual situación si aplica el estado de alarma. https://www.iberley.es/revista/analisis-stc-sobre-inconstitucionalidad-estado-alarma-covid-19-604 https://app.congreso.es/consti/constitucion/indice/sinopsis/sinopsis.jsp?art=116&tipo=2&origin=serp_auto

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852932715080757517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6E8508394CDC03C9B20F38A966175D8FB6647EF07642D3956E80401EC7D2E85
  • createdAtMillis - 1730619005173
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852932715080757517C6E8508394CDC03C9B20F38A966175D8FB6647EF07642D3956E80401EC7D2E85