Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 12:57:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56D9C7995C939B9580E673CB81DB7392F30A7249A7CDA3C66F8E4C565B9B0A26
Participant Details

Original Note:

La afirmación sobre la sentencia es falsa en lo tocante al estado de alarma. Se declaró que el uso del estado de alarma para suspender los derechos fundamentales era inconstitucional siendo el correcto el de excepción. Para la actual situación si aplica el estado de alarma. https://www.iberley.es/revista/analisis-stc-sobre-inconstitucionalidad-estado-alarma-covid-19-604 https://app.congreso.es/consti/constitucion/indice/sinopsis/sinopsis.jsp?art=116&tipo=2&origin=serp_auto

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852932715080757517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 56D9C7995C939B9580E673CB81DB7392F30A7249A7CDA3C66F8E4C565B9B0A26
  • createdAtMillis - 1730638673465
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185293271508075751756D9C7995C939B9580E673CB81DB7392F30A7249A7CDA3C66F8E4C565B9B0A26