Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 09:37:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46398B3C03D205E48450E65753D35F2CF3C48D68E8B9FE5E79AA86F8785FCA83
Participant Details

Original Note:

La afirmación sobre la sentencia es falsa en lo tocante al estado de alarma. Se declaró que el uso del estado de alarma para suspender los derechos fundamentales era inconstitucional siendo el correcto el de excepción. Para la actual situación si aplica el estado de alarma. https://www.iberley.es/revista/analisis-stc-sobre-inconstitucionalidad-estado-alarma-covid-19-604 https://app.congreso.es/consti/constitucion/indice/sinopsis/sinopsis.jsp?art=116&tipo=2&origin=serp_auto

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852932715080757517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46398B3C03D205E48450E65753D35F2CF3C48D68E8B9FE5E79AA86F8785FCA83
  • createdAtMillis - 1730626646663
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185293271508075751746398B3C03D205E48450E65753D35F2CF3C48D68E8B9FE5E79AA86F8785FCA83