Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 17:25:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 942F6EAF3253C3E5A5AC863D9D8AE375281297D32C0EC3EAB7A9FF033FA51852
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the post is factually correct. Furthermore, if the poster wishes to critique the ethics of an official action, whether or not that action followed protocol is irrelevant, because law and ethics are distinct systems https://daily-philosophy.com/can-it-be-right-to-break-the-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852929578018177387
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 942F6EAF3253C3E5A5AC863D9D8AE375281297D32C0EC3EAB7A9FF033FA51852
  • createdAtMillis - 1730654747072
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852929578018177387942F6EAF3253C3E5A5AC863D9D8AE375281297D32C0EC3EAB7A9FF033FA51852