Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 13:03:08 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E39016F361F95877B4A322CAD636255BD172AD5C6C6041E3736462FF811C4CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the post is factually correct. Furthermore, if the poster wishes to critique the ethics of an official action, whether or not that action followed protocol is irrelevant, because law and ethics are distinct systems https://daily-philosophy.com/can-it-be-right-to-break-the-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852929578018177387
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E39016F361F95877B4A322CAD636255BD172AD5C6C6041E3736462FF811C4CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1730638988169
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18529295780181773874E39016F361F95877B4A322CAD636255BD172AD5C6C6041E3736462FF811C4CB