Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 12:28:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DFD07B54D8512350641CC9A58F22674F6F32F581FE7D7E5F9D6F88BF8468F42
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the post is factually correct. Furthermore, if the poster wishes to critique the ethics of an official action, whether or not that action followed protocol is irrelevant, because law and ethics are distinct systems https://daily-philosophy.com/can-it-be-right-to-break-the-law/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852929578018177387
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DFD07B54D8512350641CC9A58F22674F6F32F581FE7D7E5F9D6F88BF8468F42
  • createdAtMillis - 1730636894730
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18529295780181773871DFD07B54D8512350641CC9A58F22674F6F32F581FE7D7E5F9D6F88BF8468F42