Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-03 02:09:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6FDD82D781B03432D112E1E9F32AC55C81B3F89BBE83FFF7111C738399D2C9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Biden-Harris administration had “probably brought unconstitutional pressure against social media platforms” to stifle free speech under the guise of combating disinformation. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852828470830637546
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6FDD82D781B03432D112E1E9F32AC55C81B3F89BBE83FFF7111C738399D2C9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1730599787261
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852828470830637546F6FDD82D781B03432D112E1E9F32AC55C81B3F89BBE83FFF7111C738399D2C9A