Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 21:50:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 799F7267B17DEBCC1867C9B52502F0506A1B7958EA70C24F0F405268DA481C58
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Biden-Harris administration had “probably brought unconstitutional pressure against social media platforms” to stifle free speech under the guise of combating disinformation. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852828470830637546
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 799F7267B17DEBCC1867C9B52502F0506A1B7958EA70C24F0F405268DA481C58
  • createdAtMillis - 1730584217343
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1852828470830637546799F7267B17DEBCC1867C9B52502F0506A1B7958EA70C24F0F405268DA481C58