Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 22:16:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4F717AA6040BEA5D21BB3F2145D165B5640B5233F6CEB2E78F339676C963CC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Biden-Harris administration had “probably brought unconstitutional pressure against social media platforms” to stifle free speech under the guise of combating disinformation. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852827909334958400
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A4F717AA6040BEA5D21BB3F2145D165B5640B5233F6CEB2E78F339676C963CC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1730585795458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1852827909334958400A4F717AA6040BEA5D21BB3F2145D165B5640B5233F6CEB2E78F339676C963CC2