Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 18:25:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DFC16E765C3084769833993D8D20E9185159B4E7C11E550E48D1F824EAA9570F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Even if a law existing were a good argument for the law existing, this is clearly a personal opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852773138494300257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DFC16E765C3084769833993D8D20E9185159B4E7C11E550E48D1F824EAA9570F
  • createdAtMillis - 1730571935729
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852773138494300257DFC16E765C3084769833993D8D20E9185159B4E7C11E550E48D1F824EAA9570F