Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 14:55:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 635E514913FD1389642CD021C9EE30A9BD77D729FFE7BACA66892145D5BE0BE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post is factually correct https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/non-proliferation/hiroshima-nagasaki-and-subsequent-weapons-testin#:~:text=On%20this%20basis%20of%20comparison,65%20and%20105%20GJ%20respectively).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852637941744452027
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 635E514913FD1389642CD021C9EE30A9BD77D729FFE7BACA66892145D5BE0BE9
  • createdAtMillis - 1730559357668
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852637941744452027635E514913FD1389642CD021C9EE30A9BD77D729FFE7BACA66892145D5BE0BE9