Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 12:42:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB9CB7EB6D15AAD1DA52DC2F6F3A4B013A09168624E45CFA939D90BA1483C7AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note being proposed is misleading: 1. Civil and criminal cases have different evidentiary standards, with civil cases having lower standards. 2. The note implies Trump would be found guilty but for the expiration of statute of limitations. https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/lawsuits-and-the-court-process/evidentiary-standards-and-burdens-of-proof/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852504640937402392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB9CB7EB6D15AAD1DA52DC2F6F3A4B013A09168624E45CFA939D90BA1483C7AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1730551348836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852504640937402392CB9CB7EB6D15AAD1DA52DC2F6F3A4B013A09168624E45CFA939D90BA1483C7AE