Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 00:33:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9A20EE79121C6C68D9FB3742BCE0C6BFE001E0F905CD9CE3A5E89BDAA16D100
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note being proposed is misleading: 1. Civil and criminal cases have different evidentiary standards, with civil cases having lower standards. 2. The note implies Trump would be found guilty but for the expiration of statute of limitations. https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/lawsuits-and-the-court-process/evidentiary-standards-and-burdens-of-proof/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852504640937402392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9A20EE79121C6C68D9FB3742BCE0C6BFE001E0F905CD9CE3A5E89BDAA16D100
  • createdAtMillis - 1730507602827
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852504640937402392B9A20EE79121C6C68D9FB3742BCE0C6BFE001E0F905CD9CE3A5E89BDAA16D100