Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 04:55:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0D3DA4D8F7009DDD71767A7F3B5DEE845BDC8096F8403C34E3180447747CBC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note being proposed is misleading: 1. Civil and criminal cases have different evidentiary standards, with civil cases having lower standards. 2. The note implies Trump would be found guilty but for the expiration of statute of limitations. https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/lawsuits-and-the-court-process/evidentiary-standards-and-burdens-of-proof/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852504640937402392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0D3DA4D8F7009DDD71767A7F3B5DEE845BDC8096F8403C34E3180447747CBC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1730523338085
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1852504640937402392A0D3DA4D8F7009DDD71767A7F3B5DEE845BDC8096F8403C34E3180447747CBC8