Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-02 11:10:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40E14418E35A18DA207F06E93EBD9F9A60E873E24FCCA9F10F4D986FDAD1BFD0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note being proposed is misleading: 1. Civil and criminal cases have different evidentiary standards, with civil cases having lower standards. 2. The note implies Trump would be found guilty but for the expiration of statute of limitations. https://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/lawsuits-and-the-court-process/evidentiary-standards-and-burdens-of-proof/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1852504640937402392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40E14418E35A18DA207F06E93EBD9F9A60E873E24FCCA9F10F4D986FDAD1BFD0
  • createdAtMillis - 1730545808773
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185250464093740239240E14418E35A18DA207F06E93EBD9F9A60E873E24FCCA9F10F4D986FDAD1BFD0